Road sweeper finds “unexpected item” in Stapylton Road — as High Barnet hit by fresh wave of ULEZ vandalism

31 Jan 2024
Written by Nick Jones

Another two of High Barnet’s ULEZ cameras are out of action after having been cut down with an angle grinder in a fresh wave of sabotage by vandals protesting at Transport for London’s £12.50 charge on vehicles which fail to meet the new ultra-low emissions standards.

Because of its position as an entry point to the ULEZ zone, cameras on roads in and around High Barnet have been subjected to repeated acts of sabotage since the charge came into effect at the end of August last year.

One of the most daring so far was the felling of the camera pole, above, at the junction of St Albans Road and Stapylton Road – which left the town centre’s road sweeper with an “unexpected item” of litter blocking the pavement.

This camera, cut round with an angle grinder just above the base, was then pushed over – an act of vandalism carried out within yards of the Stapylton Road bus stand.

Nearby residents thought it was cut down overnight between Monday (29.1.2023) and Tuesday, but they didn’t hear anything.

The St Albans Road/Stapylton Road junction is busy and there must have been a danger of being captured on CCTV or a vehicle dash cam.

The second camera to be sabotaged was on Hadley Green at the junction of Drury Road and Sydney Chapman Way – and this camera was a replacement for a camera cut down in December.

The nearest properties are the historic Wilbraham’s almshouses but the open aspect of Hadley Green offers less chance of being noticed.

Within days of TfL workmen installing a new twin camera at the Drury Road junction it was vandalised again.

Even before the charge took effect cameras in and around High Barnet started being sabotaged – connecting cables to three cameras at traffic lights at the junction of East Barnet Road and Margaret Road were cut over the August Bank holiday and so were cables on the camera at traffic lights at the junction of Barnet Hill and Underhill.

The anti-Ulez attacks around High Barnet have been nothing like as extensive in the London Borough of Bromley where most recently eight sets of traffic lights were cut down in order to disable the cameras.

Because of the extent of the damage, newspaper journalists have been trying without success to force TfL to say how many cameras have been sabotaged and how much it is costing to repair them.

TfL have refused on the grounds that this information would be “of great interest” to those who wished to disrupt the Greater London transport network for their own notoriety – especially to the group describing themselves as the “blade runners”.

Barnet’s status as a troublesome gateway to the ULEZ zone is illustrated by TfL’s reluctance to replace the camera that was overturned in Arkley at the Rowley Lane junction with the A1 fly over.

This lenses of this camera were blocked repeatedly with foam before it too was sawn through at the base and then pushed over.   

Categories: News

3 thoughts on “Road sweeper finds “unexpected item” in Stapylton Road — as High Barnet hit by fresh wave of ULEZ vandalism

  1. Another issue with the ULEZ zone in Barnet is that businesses with non-compliant diesel vehicles are entering the zone and parking their vehicles in residential streets, using them as ‘bases’ from which to work from on a daily basis. Because the vehicles are not being driven within the zone, they do not have to pay the daily charge. Whilst this might appear to be a winning strategy for the businesses in question, the local residents have to deal with a reduction in available parking spaces and the daily arrival of other ULEZ compliant vehicles collecting goods and materials from these ‘bases’ in order to carry out their business.

  2. I totally agree that this kind of vandalism is totally unacceptable.

    However, there has been no democratic process on ULEZ expansion.

    I’m pretty sure at the last mayoral election Sadiq did not tell us his plans on widening the ULEZ zone. A year or two ago he ran a consultation (yes I know, not a referendum) and then threw away the results when he didn’t like them.

    In this year’s election is he admitting that he plans on introducing pay per mile charges? I don’t think sol! Behind the scenes he is spending £100mn on developing the project! This one will bite all of us not just older car owners.

  3. This really is shocking. If you disagree with a policy, you are free to vote for something different in May along with everyone else. This is how a democracy works. What a waste of tax payers money having to clear up after these vandals.

Comments are closed.