Plans to add new housing in redevelopment plans to open up The Spires shopping centre

22 Dec 2022
Written by Nick Jones

BYM Capital, owners of The Spires shopping centre, are drawing up plans for a major redevelopment to rebuild much of the existing precinct to provide blocks of flats above shops and cafes and also to construct new homes on adjoining land.

The company says it wants to replace the shopping mall – which is currently closed at night – with a new pedestrian street through the development, from Barnet High Street to Stapylton Road.

There would be shops and cafes on either side with housing above, including affordable homes.

BYM has already held discussions with Barnet Council’s planning department.

Over the New Year it will hold consultations with community associations, retail tenants, Barnet market traders and other interested groups, as well as nearby residents.

Waitrose, which has recently agreed a new 15-year lease on its supermarket, would remain The Spires’ anchor store; Britannia Parking would continue to operate the multi-storey car park; and the paved frontage on to Stapylton Road would be kept and improved as the site of the twice-weekly Barnet Market.

Robin Bishop, who leads the Barnet Society’s planning team — and who is among those who have been briefed on the plans — has welcomed BYM’s invitation to allow local groups to engage in discussions with its architects and consultants.

He said the proposed redevelopment looked like becoming the biggest project in the town centre since the opening of The Spires in 1989 and therefore it was all the more important the town had a chance to take part in the process.

Once BYM has developed its proposals, Redwood Consulting will organise public consultations early in 2023.

When AIMCO, a Canadian pension fund, sold The Spires to BYM in May 2021 for £28 million – well below the previous valuation of £40 million – the five-acre site centre was advertised as having the potential for a mix of retail and residential development.

BYM increased the size of the site – see illustration above – in September 2022 after purchasing for around £3 million the unused former car park at the junction of Chipping Close and St Albans Road.

This was to have been the site of a Premier Inn. Under BYM’s plans it would now become available for residential development.

An aerial view showing how The Spires might be redeveloped was published in 2021 by real estate advisers Savills proposing several five-storey blocks of flats with shops and cafes on the ground floor.

In a statement announcing their proposals to redevelop The Spires, BYM say the proposed heights of their new buildings are “still very much at an early stage”.

“In broad terms we anticipate the scheme’s taller elements being within the centre of the site with the edges respecting the existing, suburban build environment and sensitive to the quality of the existing residents’ outlook.

“On the northern side – by Chipping Close – we will be guided by the height of the hotel that was recently approved for the car park.”

Planning approval – which has now expired – was granted by Barnet Council in November 2018 for a 100-room Premier Inn which would have been four storeys high.

The abandoned car park site of 0.4 acres – together with unused land in the service yard at the rear of Waitrose – would both be earmarked for residential development.

In outlining their proposals, BYM say they believe the existing shopping mall in The Spires needs to adapt to changing shopping habits and this could be encouraged with a new, enlarged pedestrian route which would connect the High Street to Stapylton Road and would be open 24/7 as a public thoroughfare.

This pedestrian route would be landscaped and bordered with shops and cafes; there would be new flexible retail units, fit for “new shopping requirements”, together with new finishes, signage, and lighting.

Fruit and vegetable stall holder Andy Gardiner – who is joint proprietor of
Barnet Market Ltd – welcomed an invitation from BYM to discuss the redevelopment of The Spires in early January.

All the indications the market traders were getting were that BYM considered the market a valuable addition to the shopping centre. Mr Gardiner was hoping the company might have further ideas on how the market could be improved.

He said he recognised that it was time the unused land around the shopping centre, including the abandoned car park in Chipping Close, was redeveloped.

BYM have emphasised that if planning approval is granted, the redevelopment will be phased to ensure that retailers can continue to operate throughout the construction phase.

No indication has been given of a possible timescale for the redevelopment but clearly the various construction projects would take several years to complete.

 

Categories: News

5 thoughts on “Plans to add new housing in redevelopment plans to open up The Spires shopping centre

  1. If there is development of the car park, better check there are no remains of the Earl of Warwick or any other men from 1471.

  2. It impossible for any article at this stage to capture the challenges this will present to the town. These challenges and their impact on the town should not be underestimated. So far there is little information in the public domain and constraints on reporting what is not. What has been said publicly is moulded around the statement made on behalf of BYM and the headlines these comments suggest. None of this is accidental.

    While the principle of adding housing to the scheme has broad support it would be wrong to assume the basic approach and details that will be released will be received with general support or acceptance.

    This situation of confidentiality has now continued for two weeks during which many stakeholders will have been lobbied separately. This includes the members of the Strategic Planning Committee who already attended such a consultation and the ward councillors who soon should do. I would just ask everyone not to form an opinion until these details are in the public domain and stakeholders including residents are free to discuss them.

    Councillors on all the planning committees should not comment or form an opinion on proposals until they are heard as planning applications by one of the committees. I am not suggesting any impropriety by councillors who I expect would have just asked for clarification on points and strictly avoided making any comment. I am just pointing out the procedural minefield.

    This is very much an evolving situation to watch very closely. Even when designs are labeled as being at a very early stage a detailed planning application can emerge very rapidly.

  3. This appears to be the previously failed attempt to build high-density flats around the Underground station transposed into the High Street. At the risk of sounding contentious, we have to ask for whom are these flats being built? Will investors, unable to obtain a decent return on capital in conventional stock markets, see investment in properties such as these as an alternative? It would result in a proportion of properties standing empty, while their value increased (“the unacceptable face of capitalism” was a phrase coined by the late Edward Heath when referring to this) and others, having been bought by investors, would be rented at high levels to individuals who can barely afford them. Furthermore, these people will make demands of the towns’s infrastructure, in the form of school places, G.P. & dental registrations, to name but a few (Where will they park their cars….?)

    Cramming housing into spaces such as The Spires doesn’t seem appropriate, when other “brown field” sites exist within the borough.

  4. The height of the buildings in the proposal is something that also concerns me.

    Five storey blocks of flats is not in-keeping with the area which, thankfully for the most part, has managed to avoid the blight of high-rise buildings. Historically, Chipping Barnet has been a predominantly rural town and it must remain that way, otherwise it will just turn into yet another concrete jungle (which is what its neighbouring towns are sadly turning in to).

    And why do none of these proposals ever consider the negative effects that yet more construction work, a new road and more buildings have on the environment and our planet’s limited resources? Or how these high-rise buildings can have a devastating effect on the mental well being of the town’s population? Oh that’s right, it’s all about the money!

  5. I have two major points. Firstly the current development has undercover protection for pedestrians- will this remain so shopping can be done in any weather. If not, this would certainly discourage me from going there.

    Secondly, I am not sure the height and density of housing is compatible and not obtrusive of the local area. Barnet is essentially a low rise borough and tall blocks of flats are unattractive and intrusive of other residents lifestyle.

    To me, these two issues must be addressed as a matters of primary importance.

Comments are closed.