Church Passage cladding: An inspector decides

Written by  Friday, 22 November 2013 15:44
The building in Church Passage The building in Church Passage
A planning inspector has now been appointed to consider the objections made by the Barnet Society and other local groups to the installation of unauthorised timber cladding above retail premises in Church Passage, in the heart of the High Barnet conservation area.

The objections were made when the owner of the former cafe and shop appealed against Barnet Council’s enforcement notice, which required the removal of the wooden cladding which had been fitted without planning permission.

It is now up to an inspector from the government’s Planning Inspectorate in Bristol

It is now up to an inspector from the government’s Planning Inspectorate in Bristol to consider both the owner’s appeal and the objections by groups such as the Barnet Society and the Barnet Residents Association.

A final decision might not be announced for several months, possibly not until mid-to late March.

Rarely have local groups spoken so clearly and with one voice in calling for the removal of the timber cladding which they regard as the “most serious and conspicuous” threat to the appearance of the conservation area.

In its objection, the Barnet Society said the Church Passage premises were part of “an attractive sequence of buildings that perform an essential role defining the north-western side of the churchyard”.

The Church of St John the Baptist and the churchyard were what remained of the historic heart of Chipping Barnet, dating from 1292 or earlier.  As the church itself was the landmark most visible to every traveller turning into High Street from Barnet Hill, the cladding was “inappropriate and detrimental”.

While the wait goes on for a decision from a planning inspector, the Society is determined to keep up the pressure for the removal of the cladding and an end to such a “flagrant breach” of the conservation area.

In many ways this has become something of a test case of the conservation area policy; several other infringements have not been rectified, despite the enforcement procedures of Barnet Council, so local groups insist that this time the planners must show they can deliver.

The Barnet's Society's objection is detailed below or view as an attachment


Representation by The Barnet Society

The Barnet Society strongly objects to the recent unauthorised recladding of no.1 Church Passage, both in principle and because of its inappropriate and detrimental execution.

St. John the Baptist’s Church and churchyard are what remains of the historic heart of Chipping Barnet, dating from 1292 or earlier.

No.1 Church Passage is one of an attractive sequence of buildings that perform an essential role defining the north-western side of the churchyard. After the Church itself, it is the landmark most visible to every traveller turning into the High Street from Barnet Hill, the main approach to the town centre.

On the matter of principle, the Council’s planning policy (viewable on its website) clearly states,

It is an offence to demolish, alter or extend a building in a conservation area without the appropriate consent
and
Conservation Area Consent is required for the demolition, or part demolition, of an unlisted building within a conservation area. This provision seeks to preserve and enhance the character of the council's conservation areas by retaining buildings which make a positive contribution to the area.

The recladding is a flagrant breach of this policy, which was adopted in July 2007. It is supported by the Council’s Wood Street Conservation Area Character Appraisal Statement, which is illustrated by a photograph of the building in question at that date:

North West views onto High StreetNorth West views onto High Street This is the most serious and conspicuous of a number of infringements that have occurred in the Conservation Area in recent years – several of which, despite enforcement procedures, have yet to be rectified.

Unless a stand is taken against it, the Council’s policy will be widely perceived as worthless.

The Society’s practical objections concern the inappropriateness of the materials and colour of the recladding, and their detrimental effect on the surroundings. The buildings around the churchyard, and characteristic of the Conservation Area, are mainly of warm red clay brick, flint, or render in white, cream or pastel shades. No.1 itself was originally of stock brick, another material typical of the area, as can be seen in the photograph below:

Church Passage 1900Church Passage 1900They do not include timber cladding, and where that is occasionally seen, for example in Moxon Street, it is weatherboarding, painted or stained dark.

It would certainly not have been lurid yellow/orange stripey close-boarding.

This is an unacceptably brash intrusion into the visual peace of the churchyard, and draws far too much attention to what are quite modest buildings.

The new treatment competes with its architecturally far more distinguished, nationally and locally listed neighbours, St.John the Baptist’s Church (largely by William Butterfield), Church House and the Hyde Institute (by T.G.Jackson).

It particularly harms the latter, a skilful example of Edwardian brickwork that was formerly complemented well by the simple brickwork, and later white render, of No.1 Church Passage.

The Society and the Chipping Barnet Town Team have for some years been fighting to revive the High Street area, and have encouraged selective restoration and improvement of properties as part of the distinctive appeal of this attractive market town on the edge of London.

Within the last two years, nearly £1 million has been spent on such work, which included a new canopy and signage to No.1 Church Passage – now trashed by the recladding.

A successful appeal by the owner/developer would open the door to similar – or worse – disfigurements, at just the moment when significant redevelopments are being proposed in the High Street area at The Spires shopping precinct and Barnet Market.

 

 

Share this post

Submit to DeliciousSubmit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google PlusSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn

9 comments

  • Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2013 15:21 posted by Martin (non-member, but frequent visitor)

    But would you have objected to the earlier covering up of the brickwork with the white rendering?

    The wood looks fine to me.

  • Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2013 17:51 posted by Tim Webster

    It looks pretty good! Quite European.

  • Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2013 17:51 posted by Jamie Maserati

    GET OVER IT TIM

  • Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2013 17:52 posted by Jennie Cobban

    That is absolutely HORRIBLE.
    It sticks out like a sore thumb.

  • Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2013 17:54 posted by Tim Webster

    Perhaps, but compared to the dozen or so boarded-up and abandoned shops along the High Street this is small potatoes

  • Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2013 17:54 posted by Jay Hollis

    Looks like it was built out of an IKEA flat pack.

  • Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2013 17:55 posted by Christine Yates

    The insidious creep of inappropriate Scandinavian-style cladding.

  • Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2013 17:55 posted by Jamie Maserati

    It's nice. Considering a centuries old church was smashed in two for the worst shopping centre known to mankind and the lovely Victorian building set back from the road - the Salisbury - was demolished for a red plastic Iceland, it's not bad.

  • Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2013 17:55 posted by Tim Webster

    Walking through the Spires just now, looking at the closed-down shops, and those that will close down shortly, I thought 'this would make a really nice park once demolished'. The future doesn't have to be bleak for Barnet, and a tiny bit of Scandinavian style would be a massive improvement.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published
All comments are moderated so there is a delay before you see them on the site
The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Barnet Society

English French German Hindi Italian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Slovak Spanish Turkish Ukrainian
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image